4 ms·
Since NAND flash is being price fixed, and likely will be for several more years to come (we're just now starting to see LCD prices drop to reasonable levels af
by otakucode 14y ago
Since NAND flash is being price fixed, and likely will be for several more years to come (we're just now starting to see LCD prices drop to reasonable levels after years and years of price fixing, I expect it'll take a similar amount of time for the NAND fixing to get busted and the market to respond), I don't think a 10% premium will be at all possible for a very long time. NAND storage SHOULD be significantly cheaper than rotational storage since it is cheaper to produce, requires fewer exotic materials, has a far wider market, etc. And eventually it will be. But for now, there is a huge premium on NAND storage. I am sure Amazon, EMC, and the others have done the math and simply don't think there is a significant market of people willing to pay for such a service, at least not at the steep rates they would have to charge to meet their growth projections.
- wmf 14y agoNote he didn't say 10% premium for the same capacity. It's possible for cloud providers to replace $50 hard disks with $64 SSDs today.
- jeffdavis 14y agoDoes a $64 SSD have enough charge to flush pending writes after a power failure? If not, then be prepared for widespread corruption. See comment by pjungwir.
- bcoates 14y agoYou're already on a cloud system, so you have to have a plan in place for your instance to up and disappear without warning. If your instance has an unplanned outage of any kind, you kill it and spawn a new one. You may as well use libeatmydata and reap the performance benefit.
- j-kidd 14y agoYou are describing EC2. Most other providers do provide proper persistence.