3 ms·

> "WhatsApp on her phone" GP clearly said she doesn't have WhatsApp.

walrus01 3mo ago
If I had a dollar for every time I've seen an older person that doesn't even know what application they're running, or can't tell the difference between the content of a website inside a browser window and an application that runs natively on their computer. I read what the GP wrote, I'm saying there's a non zero possibility she's misunderstanding something. It seems like something you have to specifically choose, on the amazon account side. https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=TZJvM20USFlkA03xwj https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeI...
- subscribed 3mo ago
  I choose to not call a GP a liar or too thick for being unable to differentiate between apps :) I also chose their presumed first hand statement than your unrelated experience with unrelated third parties. Your point re: having to subscribe to WhatsApp notifications, if we're staying in the realm of "what ifs" and looking for the awkward but possible ways to discredit the claims, I can believe that she was enrolled without being asked. I've seen at least one person complaining about that exact scenario. Cheers!
  - benj111 3mo ago
    > I choose to not call a GP a liar or too thick GP of the post or actual GP..... It's not about being thick. I had a old person ranting at me once because all these Ukrainian girls were emailing him wanting dates, and didn't they realise he was too old for them.
    - subscribed 3mo ago
      > GP The one recalling an event with their mother. Your experience with a old person is not their experience with their mother. Can you not project your own experiences on someone's else's? You claim someone's else's reasoning is wrong based on *your* opinion and past, without anything that would support the relevance in *their* case. Your experience is valid but irrelevant in that case. Don't project.
      - benj111 3mo ago
        We generalise about non technical users all the time. Why is it unfair to generalise a subset of those users? What you term 'projecting' is my own experience, where I am supporting backing the experience of someone else. Yes we may be wrong, the op hasn't clarified as far as I'm aware, but I don't think that invalidates the greater point. How should I engage with young children? Should I talk to a 2 year old like an adult? Or should I use my experience other 2 year old to inform how I should engage with other 2 year olds? Older people can be surprisingly tech illiterate to a degree many would be surprised by. That is my experience, that is others experience. Yes there will be exceptions. But I don't think that invalidates the generalisation. Personally I would hope that people would make an extra effort to educate those needing extra help in spotting potential fraud, rather than doing nothing to avoid 'projecting'.

If I had a dollar for every time I've seen an older person that doesn't even know what application they're running, or can't tell the difference between the content of a website inside a browser window and an application that runs natively on their computer. I read what the GP wrote, I'm saying there's a non zero possibility she's misunderstanding something. It seems like something you have to specifically choose, on the amazon account side. https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=TZJvM20USFlkA03xwj https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeI...

subscribed 3mo ago
I choose to not call a GP a liar or too thick for being unable to differentiate between apps :) I also chose their presumed first hand statement than your unrelated experience with unrelated third parties. Your point re: having to subscribe to WhatsApp notifications, if we're staying in the realm of "what ifs" and looking for the awkward but possible ways to discredit the claims, I can believe that she was enrolled without being asked. I've seen at least one person complaining about that exact scenario. Cheers!
- benj111 3mo ago
  > I choose to not call a GP a liar or too thick GP of the post or actual GP..... It's not about being thick. I had a old person ranting at me once because all these Ukrainian girls were emailing him wanting dates, and didn't they realise he was too old for them.
  - subscribed 3mo ago
    > GP The one recalling an event with their mother. Your experience with a old person is not their experience with their mother. Can you not project your own experiences on someone's else's? You claim someone's else's reasoning is wrong based on *your* opinion and past, without anything that would support the relevance in *their* case. Your experience is valid but irrelevant in that case. Don't project.
    - benj111 3mo ago
      We generalise about non technical users all the time. Why is it unfair to generalise a subset of those users? What you term 'projecting' is my own experience, where I am supporting backing the experience of someone else. Yes we may be wrong, the op hasn't clarified as far as I'm aware, but I don't think that invalidates the greater point. How should I engage with young children? Should I talk to a 2 year old like an adult? Or should I use my experience other 2 year old to inform how I should engage with other 2 year olds? Older people can be surprisingly tech illiterate to a degree many would be surprised by. That is my experience, that is others experience. Yes there will be exceptions. But I don't think that invalidates the generalisation. Personally I would hope that people would make an extra effort to educate those needing extra help in spotting potential fraud, rather than doing nothing to avoid 'projecting'.