3 ms·
The criticism is that a share of the money which goes to Kagi goes to Yandex.
by mort96 3mo ago
The criticism is that a share of the money which goes to Kagi goes to Yandex.
- inigyou 3mo agoI don't see what's wrong with paying Yandex for a good product.
- mort96 3mo agoSome people have trouble paying a company that's tightly coupled to the Kremlin
- inigyou 3mo agoBut companies tightly coupled to the White House are fair game? Seems pretty inconsistent.
- mort96 3mo agoNo, there's a reason there's a pretty large "buy European" movement in Europe right now and why I compared Yandex to the US white-house-adjacent Palantir.
- Marha01 3mo agoIt is not really inconsistent. Despite all the flaws of the current US government, USA is still a relatively free democracy. Russia is a full-blown fascist dictatorship. Russia is also a much more acute threat to me than Trump's USA, because I am from central European country formerly in Soviet Union's sphere of influence, that would be next on the chopping block if Ukraine falls.
- wasabi991011 3mo agoOdd attempt at whataboutism, since I think many would also be upset if Kagi was found to be paying Truth Social, for example.
- jwr 3mo agoSigh. This kind of whataboutism derails all discussions online. First, there is no requirement for "consistency". Every person chooses where to draw their moral line. The world is not black and white, but the unprovoked invasion of Ukraine by Russia, and subsequent (ongoing!) murdering, raping, and bombing of civilians is pretty clearly on one side of the line in my world. Note that this in itself says nothing about the United States or any other country. You may consider every other country and choose not to support its economy, and this in no way makes the above point weaker.