3 ms·
Yes, sorry let me explain a bit more. The idea is that we have custom agents each having a model version of their own. So, if we have a planning agent that uses
by markust 2mo ago
Yes, sorry let me explain a bit more.
The idea is that we have custom agents each having a model version of their own. So, if we have a planning agent that uses Opus and a worker agent that uses Sonnet, then the planning agent writes the plan and hands it over to the worker agent. This way, the handover here is not going to retain the context.
When the worker agent picks it up, it'd have a new context and only the todo list from the plan, so it shouldn't be reading all the files again.
- bensyverson 2mo agoAh, got it. Yeah, that's what I do using my tool, Jobs. When the plan is big enough, it's definitely cheaper & more efficient than having the "big" agent do everything.