3 ms·

https://xkcd.com/605/ https://xkcd.com/605/

• Levitz 3mo ago
  Would you bet money that they won't be good enough for coding in, say, one year? Just as a call to actual consideration, would that seem a smart bet to do? Because I find it really hard to justify dismissal at this point, sure I don't think these things will improve forever and ever, but come on. The goofy Will Smith spaghetti is a little over 3 years old. Three years. Look at where we are at.
• uejfiweun 3mo ago
  This is such a smooth-brain reply, dude. The capability literally exists, today. You're telling me that it's just SO fantastical that people will be able to catch up? Give me a break. Anthropic and OpenAI are not staffed by demigods.
  • krige 3mo ago
    That's a whole separate argument you've invented here. And if the capability exists today, why did you talk about some nebulous future?
    • uejfiweun 2mo ago
      Is it really so hard to understand that open models are behind and yet they are also continually improving and way better than they were a year ago? Like I'm not sure what your point is here. Are you purposely playing dumb to troll people or something?