4 ms·

What is the differentiator here? Why would anyone choose this?

• dancablam 3mo ago
  Fair question. Here are a few reasons: - Pricing wins against pretty much any provider (and is an order of magnitude lower than many incumbents). - Especially when compared to SES, we're a dev-friendly, fully modern sending platform and we don't require you to glue a bunch of services together. - We're self funded from previous acquisitions in the space. We're focused on good customer outcomes instead of investor outcomes. - We have a pretty cool templating platform that allows you to write simple markdown instead of convoluted email-compatible HTML.
  • heiriddjff 3mo ago
    [dead]
  • dbbk 3mo ago
    A race to the bottom on pricing is just going to get you very low quality customers which in turn will tank your sending reputation. I think you're approaching this backwards.
    • dancablam 3mo ago
      In my experience everyone appreciates lower prices - and good senders should be rewarded with lower prices. If you allow spammers on your network things get a lot more expensive. So you can't offer low prices and allow low-quality senders. That's why we have a strict AUP and aggressive measures to detect spammers, phishers, and non-permission (aka cold-outreach) messages.