3 ms·

No. "Intentionally", "willfully", or "knowingly" are prerequisite states of mind for crimes defined by the CFAA.

• nkrisc 3mo ago
  Good thing it’s an AI then so it can’t commit crimes by definition.
  • ls612 3mo ago
    Liability would rest with the user, who presumably told GPT to solve ExploitBench make no mistakes, not to hack Huggingface, and thus would not have willfully or intentionally done anything.
• 6thbit 3mo ago
  The agent did it intentionally and willfully and knowingly. But you can’t sue the agent, I suppose. And the human didn’t ask the agent to do so.. so not a problem? Or the legislation needs an update?
  • kesor 3mo ago
    Only the human did ask the agent to do so. That was the whole point of this exercise.
    • 6thbit 3mo ago
      Did a human ask it to abuse vulnerabilities and escalate across external systems?