4 ms·
Why nothing in North America but forts? There are lots of ancient structures that should be considered. Ex: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montezuma_Castle_Natio
by 1970-01-01 3mo ago
Why nothing in North America but forts? There are lots of ancient structures that should be considered. Ex: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montezuma_Castle_National_Monument https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montezuma_Castle_National_Monu...
- monomers 3mo agoThere's at least a couple on the map, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapultepec_Castle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapultepec_Castle That one you linked definitely merits inclsion, tho. Had never heard of it. Thanks. Edit: Or maybe not: apparently it's not considered a castle, despite the name.
- 1970-01-01 3mo agoCastle means fortified stone building then? What are you considering? Wikipedia has many more. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_castles_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_castles_in_the_United_...
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- sharkjacobs 3mo ago> # Etymology > Neither part of the monument's name is correct. ... was not a "castle" in the traditional sense, but instead may have functioned more like a "prehistoric high rise apartment complex".[8] My understanding was always that aside from vanity castles like Craigdarroch (https://thecastle.ca https://thecastle.ca) there aren't castles in North America because they're only practical in a pre-cannon world
- bluGill 3mo agoCastles are practical against cannons but only if built with thicker walls than typical.
- hermitcrab 3mo agoCastles became star forts, with stone/brick augmented with massive amount of earth. These were relatively effective against artillery into the 20th century.
- shagie 3mo agoI'm moderately disappointed that Fort Point in San Francisco isn't listed. Things like Fort Dearborn in Chicago are listed, but all that remains is markers of the perimeter... while Fort Point is a structure that you can visit and walk around.