3 ms·
are you advocating for not changing administrations?
by 1234letshaveatw 3mo ago
are you advocating for not changing administrations?
- nixon_why69 3mo agoIs that a good faith question? Please check the site guidelines.
- 1234letshaveatw 3mo agoIt is, and certainly relevant (although perhaps inconvenient) considering the recent elections in China. Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections?
- pessimizer 3mo agoThis is as goofy a response as answering the question "why did you make the decision to kill him" with "are you against people making decisions?"
- bigyabai 3mo ago> Aren't shifting priorities a side effect of free elections? It can be, but you're describing an instance of fossil fuel lobbying and transparent corruption: https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lobbying-spend-by-party/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/788056/us-oil-and-gas-lo...
- linkregister 3mo agouses rhetoric counterparty uses rhetoric in response "Hey! No fair!"
- nixon_why69 3mo agoPointing out that the US cancels their green projects when Republicans take over is a fact, it's not rhetoric. There's plenty of room for interesting discussion on what it takes to make green energy work. "What, are you against freedom?!" is not that.