3 ms·
This doesn't go far enough, in my opinion. I think all screens should be banned from schools. No TV, no phones, no projectors, no slides. No shortcuts for anybo
by quacked 3mo ago
This doesn't go far enough, in my opinion. I think all screens should be banned from schools. No TV, no phones, no projectors, no slides. No shortcuts for anybody, no distractions. Everything handwritten. I know this sounds like I'm sarcastically criticizing phone bans but I'm serious.
(Edit: obviously will need some accommodations for disabled students, and computer labs will have to exist for technical literacy classes.)
- troupo 3mo agoTVs are good when used appropriately. We watched Macbeth for the literature class.
- jmye 3mo ago[dead]
- ZpJuUuNaQ5 3mo agoHow would that be beneficial? We don't need to make teachers' jobs more difficult than they already are by removing all the aid brought by digitalization.
- quacked 3mo agoTeachers' jobs are difficult because they're expected to be behavioral specialists, social workers, and prison wardens. If they didn't have to do that, they wouldn't need to rely so terribly on printed worksheets and PowerPoints.
- ronsor 3mo agoWhether those things are distractions depends on what they're used for. I'm fairly certain schools had projectors a few decades ago, and nothing bad came of it. You don't really need to ban phones from schools; just ban them in class. I don't know why this stuff is treated as such a big deal. Students should pay attention in class, which means not using anything (not devices, paper, books, etc.) except as needed for instruction.
- hamper653 3mo agoPhones should be banned from children’s lives altogether. They have no benefit for them, only harm.
- ronsor 3mo agoYes, yes, we've heard that about books, radio, film, television, and game consoles. I'll put your complaint in the queue.
- hamper653 3mo ago> books, radio, film, television, and game consoles None of these tools is designed for the sole purpose of interacting with random people on the internet. A child can get all the potential benefits of a phone from books, radio, film, television and game consoles — all the while not interacting with random people on the internet.
- armchairhacker 3mo agoActually, I benefited from a school-issued Chromebook. I mostly used it for note-taking (I'm bad at handwriting) and homework. Even though it allowed some simple browser games, I suspect it was less distracting, and the browser games could've been banned if the school used a whitelist to make it even less so. Even with paper students can be distracted by doodling and daydreaming. But I wouldn't oppose banning those as long as the schools provided an AlphaSmart (because again, I'm really bad at handwriting). I think e-readers would be best but those are expensive. I think banning tools for teachers, like projectors, is unnecessary. I suspect I learned easier from projected computer screens vs. staring at a whiteboard, but anything projected on the screen (e.g. powerpoint presentations) could be passed to students on paper, except movies but those may rarely be necessary.