3 ms·

To answer for OP: We are now calling text and image generators "intelligent" in the same way a spell checker is intelligent. Whatever it's become, "AI" resear

To answer for OP: We are now calling text and image generators "intelligent" in the same way a spell checker is intelligent. Whatever it's become, "AI" research started as a way to study digital neurology, or how to digitize a mind, not just how to generate data. The Turing Test should have had a caveat, it needs to fool a, "non-stupid" person, and we still have not gotten even close to passing that version.

radial_symmetry 3mo ago
What exactly would a 'non-stupid' person do to catch the latest models on a Turing Test? Aside from being aware of AI 'tells' like em-dashes.
- dominotw 3mo ago
  If this was true. I would repalce myself with ai that pretends to be me on slack. my coworkers would know almost immediately if i did that.
  - HeatrayEnjoyer 3mo ago
    > my coworkers would know almost immediately if i did that. The same would happen if you were replaced by any random human.
    - daveguy 3mo ago
      But immitating others is about the only thing genAI does. Sometimes "others" is a 'programmer', sometimes "others" is an 'artist', but regardless, it still does it poorly.
    - dominotw 3mo ago
      that would be a silly test then
      - pixl97 3mo ago
        It sounds kind of like you made up a silly test then.
        dominotw 3mo ago
        what test?