4 ms·
how did they solve it?
by boringg 3mo ago
how did they solve it?
- jankubica 3mo agoit took months to go back fully online. they also had usable backups (so they used those for the data), but the infrastructure had so many vulnerabilities that they had to fix it first, hence the delay
- andrewshadura 3mo agoRestored from very old backups and paper documents.
- N19PEDL2 3mo ago"Very old" could mean that they were not up to date. What did they do when the backups didn't match the actual situation at the time of the breach?
- wang_li 3mo agoProperty is not fluid and doesn't change hands very often. Sure, in a large enough market lots of activity happens every day, but any given property is only involved in a transaction once a decade. You can have very old backups and still capture the state of the market to 99%+. Any recent activity will have brokers, buyers, and sellers, who all have current copies of their activity. Also, this sort of event should result in some hackers being found and jailed for life as well as their families being bankrupted permanently. Or, if they are being protected by their government, this should be considered an act of war and an appropriate military response should be delivered.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- bannable 3mo ago> as well as their families being bankrupted permanently No one thinks bills of attainder are a good idea.
- wang_li 3mo agoThis wouldn't be a bill of attainder, it's simply an infinite assessment against the criminal's estate that can't be discharged in bankruptcy. I don't personally think that people should inherit their predecessor's debts, but I have no problem with debts being able to capture the entirety of a person's wealth including homes, pensions, jewelry, trusts, any accounts from which benefit is drawn, etc.
- petre 3mo agoThe involved parties and the notaries keep copies of every transaction.
- prmoustache 3mo agoYou do a comparison with the up to date papers. It just takes ages.