2 ms·

AWS were first and dominated. Microsoft moved late with Azure, but as they had so many customers in B2B already with SQL Server and Office, that they soon grew

• vlovich123 2mo ago
  Anyone who’s actually used Azure knows it’s an unmitigated disaster for uptime. The problem is that this has been consistently true for like a decade now. This indicates real core architectural deficiencies they’ve been unable to address.
  • inigyou 2mo ago
    It's fine for things with poor uptime to exist. The problem is that people use it anyway. I think this is a lot to do with corruption. Like when Microsoft bribed a German city to stay on Windows/Office.
  • khurs 2mo ago
    Management react differently when it's a 3rd party issue: "The systems are down, it's a global Microsoft Cloud issue affecting everyone" vs "The systems are down, Bob from my team made an error but we are working to fix it"
    • vlovich123 2mo ago
      Except you still have those kinds of errors. What you’re trying to do is outsource maintenance of a system you have less expertise in for cost reasons. There is some transfer of liability that less technical management will buy but anyone serious will then ask “why is Microsoft azure having so many issues when other clouds don’t”
• inigyou 2mo ago
  Rackspace was first.