We seem to have incompatible worldviews. I understand and agree with your points about what science is and can do. But I do not share what appears to be an ab

We seem to have incompatible worldviews. I understand and agree with your points about what science is and can do. But I do not share what appears to be an absolute devotion to science. I'm really quite confused, I cannot even fathom existing for a second in this world with what I understand to be your mindset. Are you basically saying there is no point to any understanding of our lives that does not count as science? Or are you saying that it is impossible to have such an understanding? Is each and every artform a subdiscipline of science? Is making art fundamentally the same thing as performing scientific experiments? Where do you believe that you got your opinions about the supreme utility of science? Were they derived using the scientific method? I'm not asking these questions to attack you, I'm just curious. Maybe there's something I'm missing.