3 ms·
As someone that does, I disagree. Laws on this subject should exclusively apply to providers, with exceptions for medical necessity. There are too many harms th
by MrDrMcCoy 3mo ago
As someone that does, I disagree. Laws on this subject should exclusively apply to providers, with exceptions for medical necessity. There are too many harms that come from targeting individuals to be worthwhile.
- tadfisher 3mo agoProblem with that is that gathering evidence invariably leads to tracking down the recipient of the provider's service.
- MrDrMcCoy 3mo agoNot all problems can or should be solved.
- datadrivenangel 3mo agothis case was a self administrated abortion?
- MrDrMcCoy 3mo agoThe trail of injustice required to bring justice to such a case does not result in a balanced scale.
- gershy 3mo agoSome would argue there are too many harms that occur if antiabortion measures aren't taken :(
- TripolitianFish 3mo agoEither argue the point or stop talking. This is a very hard position to take seriously, twee frowny face and all, if you’re willing to sell down the river the privacy of a largely vulnerable population because some sanctimonious humanism. :(
- MrDrMcCoy 3mo agoIndeed. If bringing justice to the guilty requires punishing the innocent, what's even the point?
- gershy 3mo agoI am not an antiabortion crusader. I'm offering what I understand to be the antiabortion position here. By ":(" I wanted to imply "Unfortunately there are seemingly lots of people who seem to hold this view genuinely and very strongly", which was not my greatest moment of clear communication.