What about Google? They make a copy of almost every image on the internet with the full knowledge that they are nearly all covered under an absolute copyright l

What about Google? They make a copy of almost every image on the internet with the full knowledge that they are nearly all covered under an absolute copyright license of "All Rights Reserved", including the right to store and rehost a copy of that content. How would Google's financial outlook change if they decide to follow the letter of the law and never use pieces of copyrighted works "for financial gain" without explicit permission from each rightsholder first? It seems to me that the only difference between Google and NZBMatrix et al is that the media companies like one more than the other.