3 ms·
I think your perception of events is pretty heavily affected by personal bias here. Objecting to a hasty AI rewrite of an entire runtime and objecting to violat
by afavour 3mo ago
I think your perception of events is pretty heavily affected by personal bias here. Objecting to a hasty AI rewrite of an entire runtime and objecting to violating the spirit of FOSS is “very social justice warrior”?
What?
- firesteelrain 3mo agoPlease re read your original comment. AI rewrite is one thing and objecting to FOSS/non FOSS is a new argument, anti-Anthropic etc is moving the goal posts. The main argument was the blanket rewrite to Rust using Claude. Now, /you/ are trying to move the goalposts into an entirely different argument. Very likely it’s just anti Anthropic altogether. Like I said, a meme. Anthropic hasn’t done anything wrong but if they move a single inch then people will complain. Perhaps it is just a preview version?
- afavour 3mo agoAiring two entirely separate objections to a project is not “moving the goalposts”. The original objection still stands! You’re using a phrase you’ve heard in an inappropriate context. I’m sorry but this is a nonsensical debate. > Now, /you/ are trying to move the goalposts into an entirely different argument. You said something and I responded to it. That’s invalid too now? There can only ever be one single objection in a conversation? I’m not permitted to react to the things said? Like I said, nonsense.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- firesteelrain 3mo ago[dead]