4 ms·

That PR is the rust rewrite. That's some time in the past now. As of this comment, there is no tagged 1.4 release. This is the present. Anthropic is using appar

by jdiff 3mo ago

That PR is the rust rewrite. That's some time in the past now. As of this comment, there is no tagged 1.4 release. This is the present. Anthropic is using apparently a version of Bun that is not publicly available. This is orthogonal to it being Rust-based, as all Bun releases now will be.

simonw 3mo ago
It's publicly available in the GitHub repository and if you run "bun upgrade --canary" - https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/releases/tag/canary https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/releases/tag/canary
- jdiff 3mo ago
  That commit (and main) still purports to be 1.3.14, the version numbers haven't changed. Does that not still suggest Anthropic is using something else?
  - simonw 3mo ago
    I think Bun/Anthropic should document which commit hash their "1.4" as shipped in Claude Code uses.
alexjurkiewicz 3mo ago
Come on, "not publicly available"? You know how git works right? Each Claude release probably has the HEAD of main compiled as "1.4.0" until there is a real official release.
- jdiff 3mo ago
  I do know how git works and in my experience, while the version number sometimes doesn't get bumped until just before a release is tagged, the version number comes from the codebase. If they're building something that says 1.4.0, then they have a codebase that disagrees with ours.
  - Lerc 3mo ago
    Where is the previous version referred to in the codebase? I'm guessing that would be the place to look for changes. If you can't find an update at that place in the codebase saying 1.4.0 you can ask where it is. It seems after doing that and not receiving an answer would be the appropriate time to start making the claims that people are throwing around. This seems like a candidate https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/commit/b18bf6d1d0a92238f240bfd125f0e3b3461b9243#diff-7ae45ad102eab3b6d7e7896acd08c427a9b25b346470d7bc6507b6481575d519R4 https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/commit/b18bf6d1d0a92238f240bf...
- queenkjuul 3mo ago
  The commit hash reported by "1.4" doesn't exist in the public repo

by jdiff 3mo ago

simonw 3mo ago

It's publicly available in the GitHub repository and if you run "bun upgrade --canary" - https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/releases/tag/canary https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/releases/tag/canary

jdiff 3mo ago
That commit (and main) still purports to be 1.3.14, the version numbers haven't changed. Does that not still suggest Anthropic is using something else?
- simonw 3mo ago
  I think Bun/Anthropic should document which commit hash their "1.4" as shipped in Claude Code uses.

alexjurkiewicz 3mo ago

Come on, "not publicly available"? You know how git works right? Each Claude release probably has the HEAD of main compiled as "1.4.0" until there is a real official release.

jdiff 3mo ago
I do know how git works and in my experience, while the version number sometimes doesn't get bumped until just before a release is tagged, the version number comes from the codebase. If they're building something that says 1.4.0, then they have a codebase that disagrees with ours.
- Lerc 3mo ago
  Where is the previous version referred to in the codebase? I'm guessing that would be the place to look for changes. If you can't find an update at that place in the codebase saying 1.4.0 you can ask where it is. It seems after doing that and not receiving an answer would be the appropriate time to start making the claims that people are throwing around. This seems like a candidate https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/commit/b18bf6d1d0a92238f240bfd125f0e3b3461b9243#diff-7ae45ad102eab3b6d7e7896acd08c427a9b25b346470d7bc6507b6481575d519R4 https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/commit/b18bf6d1d0a92238f240bf...
queenkjuul 3mo ago
The commit hash reported by "1.4" doesn't exist in the public repo