> Is the high expense coming from cache misses? Yup. They can't keep your workload in cache forever, or they would run out of cache for users. > I wonder woul

> Is the high expense coming from cache misses? Yup. They can't keep your workload in cache forever, or they would run out of cache for users. > I wonder would starting new sessions and having to re-read the contexts and results anyway be any cheaper. Yes, that's what they recommend