3 ms·

Interesting. But, evolution is way too unconstrained to provide us a path to "agi". It would require too much compute. Evolution also eventually gets frustrate

Interesting. But, evolution is way too unconstrained to provide us a path to "agi". It would require too much compute. Evolution also eventually gets frustrated and creates the brain, capable of in context learning. Maybe we should take some notes from these massively parallel, shallow, and highly recurrent constructions.

bob1029 3mo ago
If evolution had access to TSMC's process technology, do you think it wouldn't leverage it? The signals in my AMD CPU propagate ~1,000,000x faster than the ones in my brain.
- eyvindn 3mo ago
  ^ yes. this is what we hope.
  - vatsachak 3mo ago
    Super big fan of your work on cellular automata. Do you have anything interesting papers coming up?
    - eyvindn 3mo ago
      yes! very soon!
- vatsachak 3mo ago
  Yeah. But we need throw money at studying the brain, instead of another billion to "agents which understand you truly"
tim333 3mo ago
Real evolution produced human intelligence. Constrained evolutionary algorithms may have some promise.