4 ms·

I take it you are a lawyer specializing in NY real estate law, then? Would be interesting to hear a more detailed analysis if so.

Eridrus 3mo ago
I am honestly so surprised that everyone on HN is so naive that they take political statements like this at face value. Politicians routinely say they will do things they do not have the authority to do, and it's often very important to understanding what will actually happen to have some understanding of what authorities are available to them, or at the very least ask Google/LLMs about it.
- horusborus 3mo ago
  [dead]
- enraged_camel 3mo ago
  Ah, so you aren’t a lawyer then.
- senordevnyc 2mo ago
  Actually, studies show that politicians keep their promises, or at least attempt to, more often than not.
valleyer 3mo ago
The law applies to everyone, so it's reasonable for everyone to try to understand it, not just attorneys. Similarly, it's fine for people to have opinions on food, dental hygiene, and the tax code without being a chef, a dentist, and an accountant.
- rapidaneurism 3mo ago
  I thought it was illegal in new york (and probably the rest of the us) to give legal advice if not a lawyer. And in my understanding interpreting the law as opposed to just reciting it constitutes legal advice.
  - kennywinker 3mo ago
    Pot, meet kettle.
  - valleyer 3mo ago
    No, merely analyzing or discussing the law generally does not constitute the practice of law. If it did, plenty of newspaper articles, law review journals (often written by law students), non-attorney legal aid, and legal pamphlets would be prohibited. If you want something more concrete, I googled it, and in New York, there appears to have been a case New York County Lawyers’ Association v. Dacey, in which Dacey wrote a book "How to Avoid Probate!", and the NYCA accepted a dissent in a lower court, stating in part: Does the writing, publication, advertising, sale and distribution of "How To Avoid Probate!" constitute the unauthorized practice of law within the meaning of subdivision B of section 750? It cannot be claimed that the publication of a legal text which purports to say what the law is amounts to legal practice. And the mere fact that the principles or rules stated in the text may be accepted by a particular reader as a solution to his problem does not affect this. and later humorously quoting: "[I]t is a prized American privilege to speak one's mind, although not always with perfect good taste, on all public institutions" (Bridges v. California, 314 U. S. 252, 270) https://accessiblelaw.org/Disclaimer.html https://accessiblelaw.org/Disclaimer.html

Eridrus 3mo ago

I am honestly so surprised that everyone on HN is so naive that they take political statements like this at face value. Politicians routinely say they will do things they do not have the authority to do, and it's often very important to understanding what will actually happen to have some understanding of what authorities are available to them, or at the very least ask Google/LLMs about it.

horusborus 3mo ago
[dead]
enraged_camel 3mo ago
Ah, so you aren’t a lawyer then.
senordevnyc 2mo ago
Actually, studies show that politicians keep their promises, or at least attempt to, more often than not.

valleyer 3mo ago

The law applies to everyone, so it's reasonable for everyone to try to understand it, not just attorneys. Similarly, it's fine for people to have opinions on food, dental hygiene, and the tax code without being a chef, a dentist, and an accountant.

rapidaneurism 3mo ago
I thought it was illegal in new york (and probably the rest of the us) to give legal advice if not a lawyer. And in my understanding interpreting the law as opposed to just reciting it constitutes legal advice.
- kennywinker 3mo ago
  Pot, meet kettle.
- valleyer 3mo ago
  No, merely analyzing or discussing the law generally does not constitute the practice of law. If it did, plenty of newspaper articles, law review journals (often written by law students), non-attorney legal aid, and legal pamphlets would be prohibited. If you want something more concrete, I googled it, and in New York, there appears to have been a case New York County Lawyers’ Association v. Dacey, in which Dacey wrote a book "How to Avoid Probate!", and the NYCA accepted a dissent in a lower court, stating in part: Does the writing, publication, advertising, sale and distribution of "How To Avoid Probate!" constitute the unauthorized practice of law within the meaning of subdivision B of section 750? It cannot be claimed that the publication of a legal text which purports to say what the law is amounts to legal practice. And the mere fact that the principles or rules stated in the text may be accepted by a particular reader as a solution to his problem does not affect this. and later humorously quoting: "[I]t is a prized American privilege to speak one's mind, although not always with perfect good taste, on all public institutions" (Bridges v. California, 314 U. S. 252, 270) https://accessiblelaw.org/Disclaimer.html https://accessiblelaw.org/Disclaimer.html