5 ms·

Obviously not, though they may count as misleading image manipulation, and should be similarly regulated. The problem is subjectivity - AI is just a convenient

Obviously not, though they may count as misleading image manipulation, and should be similarly regulated. The problem is subjectivity - AI is just a convenient bright line with an easy definition.

dmix 3mo ago
You want the government to monitor people's profiles on dating apps? The ministry of dating photos
- mh- 3mo ago
  Oi, you got a loicense for that f-stop slop?
- inigyou 3mo ago
  Making murder illegal doesn't imply that the government stalks you 24/7 to make sure you don't murder someone
  - dmix 3mo ago
    Not every comment on the internet is 100% serious
    - inigyou 3mo ago
      In this context the opposite would be called "trolling" and is not allowed on HN.
      - dmix 3mo ago
        That is not even close to trolling. It's called a joke where you exaggerate the premise because it's an amusing thought.
jefftk 3mo ago
I'm not sure the line defining what you would consider AI is actually all that bright. Sharpening? Content-aware fill? Seam carving? Style transfer? How would you define AI to draw the line where you want?