3 ms·
Destroying food is pretty cheap. you put it in the dumpster. Picking through it, sending it to a shelter, and vetting the people at the shelter seems more expen
by s1artibartfast 3mo ago
Destroying food is pretty cheap. you put it in the dumpster. Picking through it, sending it to a shelter, and vetting the people at the shelter seems more expensive.
> Well, maybe wasting food should cost?
Why? Wasting food should be be free. The owner paid for it.
- zb3 3mo ago> Destroying food is pretty cheap. you put it in the dumpster. Picking through it, sending it to a shelter, and vetting the people at the shelter seems more expensive. But at least first lowering prices until they reach 0 seems cheaper? > Why? Wasting food should be be free. The owner paid for it. Because that's a vile thing to do when someone else wants to eat it, don't you think?
- UltraSane 3mo agoGiving away food is pretty cheap. You just put it on a shelf with a big "FREE" sign.