3 ms·
That’s not his prediction, he made it clear they are useful. His conclusion for that section is this: > The only real question for me is: Are the LLM-code-revi
by dgellow 4mo ago
That’s not his prediction, he made it clear they are useful. His conclusion for that section is this:
> The only real question for me is: Are the LLM-code-review tools economically viable outside the bubble?
- simianthoughts 4mo agoSo is he suggesting that in the future, models of Opus 4.8 tier will no longer be as affordable? Like it would become 3-5x more expensive? Now that's quite a prediction.
- ai_fry_ur_brain 4mo ago[dead]
- dgellow 4mo agoI’m not exactly sure but I think he’s implying the AI labs aren’t profitable on inference? And that once the bubble pops those models won’t be available anymore? Just my assumptions
- intended 4mo agoI believe the added point was that new tools identify a group of bugs, and then there aren’t more bugs to find. At which point it becomes another tool you use and don’t think about. Also, from what I recall, Anthropic and OpenAI subsidize their prices by ~40x? That said, given the prices*quality of recently released open models, I think the cost issue is moot.
- simianthoughts 4mo ago> Also, from what I recall, Anthropic and OpenAI subsidize their prices by ~40x? Ed Zitron said this?
- intended 4mo agohttps://techjacksolutions.com/ai-brief/a-200-subscription-costs-openai-up-to-14000-in-compute-semia/ https://techjacksolutions.com/ai-brief/a-200-subscription-co...
- simianthoughts 4mo agoenterprises aren't using subscriptions..