4 ms·
You are confidently acting like you understand this process, while repeatedly confusing design certification (of the type) vs. airworthiness certification (of i
by rogerrogerr 3mo ago
You are confidently acting like you understand this process, while repeatedly confusing design certification (of the type) vs. airworthiness certification (of individual airplanes).
- estearum 3mo agoIn the above OIG finding, can you please explain what "ODA" means? Maybe DOT OIG is confused? Big if true!
- rogerrogerr 3mo agoNah, you can figure that out pretty easily yourself, and I get the sense your question is not in good faith. Earlier in this thread you called someone "profoundly lazy" for asking a less simple question. There are many types of designation in the system; your quote above is _not_ about Production Certification ODA staff (which this article is about), and indeed there is no world where Production Certification ODA would be expected to find the MCAS issue your quote is about. Those would be Type Certification ODA folks.
- estearum 3mo agoYou should go read the OIG report. Kind of a bummer because they put all this work into a document that you're just sitting here exemplifying the exact misunderstanding that they found as the major issue.
- bobthebob 3mo agoYikes dude, you call me lazy. This is hilarious.
- estearum 3mo agoOh it was a rhetorical question, which is why sibling declined to answer.