3 ms·
> I also wonder whether the roof rule was written preemptively or retrospectively -- I hope the former. Presume you're referring to [1], not the page you linke
by ghostly_s 3mo ago
> I also wonder whether the roof rule was written preemptively or retrospectively -- I hope the former.
Presume you're referring to [1], not the page you linked, and one might be inclined to accuse you of __feigning surprise__ but if not: using the roof is a quite common expectation in mid-rise buildings in big cities like NY, though not usually in a building you don't yourself own/lease in.
1. https://www.recurse.com/code-of-conduct https://www.recurse.com/code-of-conduct
- golly_ned 3mo agoWhy would you think they are talking about an entirely different page and topic?
- sincerely 3mo agoWell there is no “roof rule” on the page they linked
- serial_dev 3mo agoIt might have been AutoCorrect, and the “social rules” the original comment makes hundred times more sense that way
- dxdm 3mo agoThe social rules page links to the code of conduct, which contains a rule about the roof. The most sensible interpretation to me is that OP wanted to comment on both, possibly forgetting that they had to follow a link to the roof rule, or maybe actively considering both pages to be a single unit. That would be the"strongest interpretation" of OPs comment, which the local guidelines prefer us to respond to.
- andrew_eu 3mo agoI'm honestly surprised how controversial this sub thread became. To put it to rest -- this is indeed correct. I commented on the roof rule but didn't link to the code of conduct because doing so didn't really seem to add anything that a reader couldn't find on their own.
- zahlman 3mo agoI can't imagine what word might have been autocorrected to "roof" that would make more sense here.
- albedoa 3mo agoPause and consider the joint probability that anything was autocorrected to "roof rule" and that it just so happens to be the name of one of their rules.
- albedoa 3mo agoOP referenced the roof rule by name in the OP, which was quoted in the comment that you are replying to. What do you mean "an entirely different topic"?