3 ms·
The way you describe requires somehow counting every bit but somehow discarding most which is obviously nonsense. This seems statistically invalid insofar as i
by michaelmrose 3mo ago
The way you describe requires somehow counting every bit but somehow discarding most which is obviously nonsense.
This seems statistically invalid insofar as it will tend to overbill potentially by a lot on the minority of cases.
Don't you know how much of the pipe is occupied by a given customers code at any given time or what data is being sent
- londons_explore 3mo agoYou have to do it when the customer list is too big to keep a counter per customer.
- michaelmrose 3mo agoNo you don't
- fc417fc802 3mo agoA probabilistic counter per customer is also a counter per customer. Still, probabilistic billing is an amusing thought though.