3 ms·

The user is asking me to calculate how much money they should charge their customer. The values they've given me are 0.45, 1.67, and 2.50. This is 2.50 + 1.67 +

The user is asking me to calculate how much money they should charge their customer. The values they've given me are 0.45, 1.67, and 2.50. This is 2.50 + 1.67 + 0.45 = 4.62, but it could be any other number. Perhaps we should be concatenating the numbers instead. Wait! The . could also mean multiplication. 0 . 45 . 1. 67 . 2 . 50 = 3015000. But wouldn't multiplying by 0 zero it out? That can't be right, we wouldn't be charging anything. So 3015000 must be correct. You should charge your customer 3015000 thousand dollars.

idiotsecant 3mo ago
Would be funny if it wasn't so close to true
- yunnpp 3mo ago
  'My absurd statement doesn't sound right, so the "opposite" (assuming it's well-defined and unique) must be true' is peak LLM logic. You can tell it was trained on Reddit commentary.
  - picofarad 3mo ago
    Was it proof by contrapositive?
Izkata 3mo ago
So uh did you type that out or generate it somewhere? Number felt high so I wanted to double check and I only get 301500.
- VulgarExigency 3mo ago
  I typed it. I'm afraid my biological neural network has been trained by reading too many chains-of-thought. I might have added an extra 0 by accident, I didn't double check, but that just makes it more AI-like, really.