3 ms·
IMO that’s awesome. I like when folks are clever. Just modify the rules next go around. It’s a contest judged by and LLM. Not sure why we would take it that se
by infecto 3mo ago
IMO that’s awesome. I like when folks are clever. Just modify the rules next go around.
It’s a contest judged by and LLM. Not sure why we would take it that serious.
- inigyou 3mo agoYes, if they used Role Confusion they could've won first.
- nabbed 3mo agoKobayashi Maru :)
- infecto 3mo agoAbsolutely. I also think rule of exploitation is how we figure out balance and new rules. This applies to governments, companies and societal norms. We don’t know until we push the boundaries.
- cryptonym 3mo agoPeople tend to take $100K seriously, especially the ones who tried with more than a mere prompt injection.
- infecto 3mo agoSure but it’s one of those things imo that happens. Google should have been more rigorous with their judging. They may lose face for future hackathons or simply it becomes a gating item in the rules. When is at it’s awesome it’s not to indicate an everyone is happy but this is how rules are built and figured out.
- hoppp 3mo agoEventually LLMs will decide between life and death, heck, they are doing it already. People take the outputs seriously
- inigyou 3mo agoHealth insurance companies are using LLMs to find reasons to deny care (never to approve it)