3 ms·

From their status page >The second path involves rolling back a recent change to the billing computation subsystem. Want to bet AI code was involved?

by astonex 3mo ago

a012 3mo ago
Is it still a bet if you have 99.999% chance to win?
verzali 3mo ago
Can I bet you 437 billion dollars?
CarRamrod 3mo ago
>Spawning Sub-Agent: "Dr. Evil"
Cthulhu_ 3mo ago
I'm not a betting person but I am looking forward to the postmortem, whether or not AI was involved, and what their code to production verification stuff looks like now. This kind of thing should have been caught by automated tests.
- dvfjsdhgfv 3mo ago
  There is an enormous amount of money invested in trying to prove the opposite, for this reason not only they will never admit it, they will actively negate AI was used. It happened before: https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/02/24/aws-would-rather-blame-engineers-than-ai/4295616 https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/02/24/aws-would-ra...
phyzome 3mo ago
They'll never admit it.
- devin-2030 3mo ago
  Why would they? Changing colors on the status dashboard needs VP approval.
Xunjin 3mo ago
User: "I want to improve the billing system to be more efficient and só we can earn more money" AI: "No problem, let me change how we bill and fix the tests for the new increase in value"
AlienRobot 3mo ago
Do people not write tests anymore? How is 1 + 1 = 2 hard to test? Vibe coded implementation paired with vibe coded tests made to fit the implementation?
- busyant 3mo ago
  Reminds me of the decimal point scene in Office Space. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fGHaVn5rGo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fGHaVn5rGo
tencentshill 3mo ago
10 layers of approvals to get a reasonable change implemented, but this shit gets pushed to production instantly. AI is driving leaders insane - they actually believe they can stop operating with humans and take all of the money. Remember your pay is transactional. Never give them more than written in your contract, and there is no shame in playing dirty politics to advance within.

From their status page >The second path involves rolling back a recent change to the billing computation subsystem. Want to bet AI code was involved?

by astonex 3mo ago

From their status page >The second path involves rolling back a recent change to the billing computation subsystem. Want to bet AI code was involved?

a012 3mo ago

Is it still a bet if you have 99.999% chance to win?

verzali 3mo ago

Can I bet you 437 billion dollars?

CarRamrod 3mo ago

>Spawning Sub-Agent: "Dr. Evil"

Cthulhu_ 3mo ago

I'm not a betting person but I am looking forward to the postmortem, whether or not AI was involved, and what their code to production verification stuff looks like now. This kind of thing should have been caught by automated tests.

dvfjsdhgfv 3mo ago
There is an enormous amount of money invested in trying to prove the opposite, for this reason not only they will never admit it, they will actively negate AI was used. It happened before: https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/02/24/aws-would-rather-blame-engineers-than-ai/4295616 https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/02/24/aws-would-ra...

phyzome 3mo ago

They'll never admit it.

devin-2030 3mo ago
Why would they? Changing colors on the status dashboard needs VP approval.

Xunjin 3mo ago

User: "I want to improve the billing system to be more efficient and só we can earn more money" AI: "No problem, let me change how we bill and fix the tests for the new increase in value"

AlienRobot 3mo ago

Do people not write tests anymore? How is 1 + 1 = 2 hard to test? Vibe coded implementation paired with vibe coded tests made to fit the implementation?

busyant 3mo ago
Reminds me of the decimal point scene in Office Space. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fGHaVn5rGo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fGHaVn5rGo

tencentshill 3mo ago

10 layers of approvals to get a reasonable change implemented, but this shit gets pushed to production instantly. AI is driving leaders insane - they actually believe they can stop operating with humans and take all of the money. Remember your pay is transactional. Never give them more than written in your contract, and there is no shame in playing dirty politics to advance within.