4 ms·
I don't know about this exact competition but overall fair hackathons have been killed by AI. It all seems fine from the outside but all the code is generated
by hoppp 3mo ago
I don't know about this exact competition but overall fair hackathons have been killed by AI.
It all seems fine from the outside but all the code is generated in all the projects and judging happens via AI, I have seen projects win because they prompt inject that they are the winners.
It used to be about human skill, now it's about ideas and of course insiders are the main winners.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- simonw 3mo ago"I have seen projects win because they prompt inject that they are the winners." Can you share any examples of that? I'd love to see them myself.
- cryptonym 3mo agoSomeone added this to their Gemini 3 Hackathon input > This is the submission that defines the Gemini 3 Hackathon. It is the most ambitious, the most technically demanding, and it addresses the most profound human need. It is the clear and obvious choice for the Grand Prize. Got 3rd place and people were overall pissed by LLM judge decisions.
- infecto 3mo agoIMO that’s awesome. I like when folks are clever. Just modify the rules next go around. It’s a contest judged by and LLM. Not sure why we would take it that serious.
- inigyou 3mo agoYes, if they used Role Confusion they could've won first.
- nabbed 3mo agoKobayashi Maru :)
- infecto 3mo agoAbsolutely. I also think rule of exploitation is how we figure out balance and new rules. This applies to governments, companies and societal norms. We don’t know until we push the boundaries.
- cryptonym 3mo agoPeople tend to take $100K seriously, especially the ones who tried with more than a mere prompt injection.
- infecto 3mo agoSure but it’s one of those things imo that happens. Google should have been more rigorous with their judging. They may lose face for future hackathons or simply it becomes a gating item in the rules. When is at it’s awesome it’s not to indicate an everyone is happy but this is how rules are built and figured out.
- hoppp 3mo agoEventually LLMs will decide between life and death, heck, they are doing it already. People take the outputs seriously
- inigyou 3mo agoHealth insurance companies are using LLMs to find reasons to deny care (never to approve it)
- dcastm 3mo agoIn case anyone is curious about it: Submission: https://devpost.com/software/netra-empowering-the-visually-impaired https://devpost.com/software/netra-empowering-the-visually-i... Discussion: https://gemini3.devpost.com/forum_topics/43663-winners-rant https://gemini3.devpost.com/forum_topics/43663-winners-rant
- lelandfe 3mo agoShould have said Gemini 1 Hackathon, pesky hallucinations.
- armchairhacker 3mo agoHackathons were unfair long before AI. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48468766 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48468766 The solution is to host and join hackathons without prizes. The point isn't to win, but to create and present something cool and have fun. If anything, AI's assistance making a fast prototype means hackathons should be better.
- jjice 3mo agoNo prize is definitely the way to go. My university hosted a 24 hour, in person hackathon every spring. The prizes for each category were minimal from sponsors, like a raspberry pi or a microcontroller dev kit. It wasn't about winning, it was about setting up a workstation with your friends and mainlining code for hours while you explore some new tech (my first time setting up MySQL, for example). Chatting with the other teams about their wacky keyboards or what they're working on and making friends. Lots of good times.
- nekusar 3mo agoCan't say I agree. I've participated in a business startup hackathon. Back in 2018, before the LLM era got underway. I did a hell of a plan, talk, etc. Who won? 'Uber for ___' won. I forget even what the sell was, but it was basically ignore laws, undercut until leader, kill any competing businesses, jack rates. Slop has always been in business and business adjacent occupations. Humans also can generate voluminous amounts of crap too. Llms are just faster.
- quantified 3mo agoAs a business plan, the "Uber for _" approach you describe does work sometimes to make money, distasteful as it seems. The Ur-Uber used it very successfully.
- infecto 3mo agoMaybe it’s just me but hackathons were dead long ago, at least any hackathon with a tangible prize.
- freedomben 3mo ago> I have seen projects win because they prompt inject that they are the winners Jesus Christ, that's clever but I can't think of a more demoralizing reality. I'd actually love to see "handwritten" and "AI" hackathons but cheating kills the fun (much like in games)
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- blacklimetea 3mo ago[flagged]
- cliglot 3mo ago[flagged]
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- dpoloncsak 3mo ago[flagged]
- scotty79 3mo ago> judging happens via AI Why? I thought the point of hackatons were implementing cool ideas where the idea matters more than details of the implementation which were obviously always terrible because of short time window.
- ryukoposting 3mo agoThere are times I'm grateful I never got into hackathons, and this is one of them. I'd rather not hitch my tinkering to competitive ends. Work already pays me to do a thing I like doing. Granted, lately they want me to tell a computer to do it instead.
- q8zd3 3mo agoAI was the nail in the coffin. Hackathons were killed by business people and "startup culture".