4 ms·
> Instead of limiting models and debating ethics This is what liability management looks like for proprietary models. If it's not out in the open, then you can
by bigyabai 4mo ago
> Instead of limiting models and debating ethics
This is what liability management looks like for proprietary models. If it's not out in the open, then you can be held directly accountable for generating the tokens that kill people. They're having these conversations to avoid being held liable, not because they're offended by people dying because of AI.
- yogthos 4mo agoHas anybody been held liable? https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/06/usa-four-months-after-horrific-minab-school-airstrike-accountability-delayed/ https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/06/usa-four-mont...
- el_io 4mo agoNo because USA is free to murder people, overthrow government. Citizens will cheer for their government, but they're scared about hypothetical scenarios where China win AI race.
- rw2 4mo ago[flagged]
- bigyabai 4mo agoThat's reaching speculation, and a hell of a hypothetical to base your entire argument on. The "edge AI labs" are both begging for more regulation and a stronger federal presence in their development. Their desire is to be embedded in the killing machine where the monopoly on violence applies, and then abdicate themselves in civil suits when they're held accountable for ethical dilemmas. To get away with it, they have to limit the average Joe and upsell the government the full product.
- bushbaba 4mo agoMura Murati was CTO but not the AI lead. Her role was mostly organizational not scientific.
- 0xpgm 4mo agoWould you explain farther how China winning the AI race would result in world war 3 deaths?
- rw2 3mo agoSure, China will build a lead in robotics, drones and weapon tech. They will invade Taiwan, US defends, WW3. If they don't have a military/tech lead, the status quo remains.
- pluralmonad 4mo agoHow does one "win the AI race?" If there is a concrete finish line, there are likely no winners.