3 ms·
But they are not claiming that current models are better than humans but later developments might. Do you think that a descendant of a fish could be a playwrig
by Lerc 3mo ago
But they are not claiming that current models are better than humans but later developments might.
Do you think that a descendant of a fish could be a playwright or put on a play?
- TehCorwiz 3mo agoObjectively no. Fish form animals have been around far longer than mammals and we've touched the moon.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- Lerc 3mo agoWell I would expect them to have been around for longer if they were to be ancestors of mammals.
- runarberg 3mo agoTaking your logic to its conclusion fishes (or descendants of fish) regularly recite Shakespeare. However there is a major flaw in your logic. Fishes (or their descendants) reciting Shakespeare is part of natural history. AI making quality music videos is just a prediction (or maybe even just wishful thinking). The former has occurred and has been observed, the later has not. So you are comparing nature with science fiction.
- IanCal 3mo ago> Taking your logic to its conclusion fishes (or descendants of fish) regularly recite Shakespeare. I believe that was the point.