3 ms·

You seem to be stating a general rule when this concerns only a very small amount of cases (not the loudness war itself, but when the vinyl uses a different and

You seem to be stating a general rule when this concerns only a very small amount of cases (not the loudness war itself, but when the vinyl uses a different and drastically better master) that's also quite dependent on genre. And omit that a lot of music sounds a lot worse on vinyl due to its lack of dynamic range and poor LF capabilities (classical, electronic). This isn't for nothing that the first recording pressed on CD was a rendition of the Alpensinfonie.

criddell 3mo ago
> You seem to be stating a general rule I was trying not to. I thought saying "it might sound better to you" would make it clear that it's a subjective matter of taste.
- BoingBoomTschak 3mo ago
  I meant "general" with regards to the material, not the listener. I have myself digitized a few rare cases like Celtic Frost's Monotheist because the CD was horrid and I know pop and rock suffered much more from the phenomenon, but unless the music was released first as a vinyl then got later butchered on CD (so before '85~88), it's very rare to have a situation where the vinyl is objectively better. One such case I encountered was Unknown Pleasures (https://world-playground-deceit.net/blog/2025/11/music-review-joy-division-unknown-pleasures-1979-.html https://world-playground-deceit.net/blog/2025/11/music-revie...) but I finally found a CD worth the change. Kraftwerk and Depeche Mode were also bands that gave me much trouble when navigating their haphazard CD master landscape.