4 ms·

Interesting article, but those videos aren’t. Not even pre-MTV quality. While checking out the gallery, came across this image: https://www.tryai.dev/gallery/

by xoxxala 3mo ago

Interesting article, but those videos aren’t. Not even pre-MTV quality. While checking out the gallery, came across this image: https://www.tryai.dev/gallery/d3725e9b-1df9-4c10-8a23-2fc705d011d8 https://www.tryai.dev/gallery/d3725e9b-1df9-4c10-8a23-2fc705... There’s something wrong with it, but I just can’t put my paw on the problem.

qwerpy 3mo ago
For fun, I took that image and put it into a few models and asked it "what is wrong with this genAI image?" Grok fast came up with a lot of minor quibbles and missed the issue. Grok expert touched on it with a "Limbs/anatomy ambiguity / This creates a slight "how many legs does this cat actually have?" moment." but then moved on to complain about texturing . Later it summarized the issue as "classic "animal + held object" anatomy problem". Chatgpt 5.6 instant didn't notice it Chatgpt 5.6 medium didn't notice it and mainly complained about the background being blurry Chatgpt 5.6 high (46s) "The biggest error is the cat appears to have six paws" Google AI mode complained about whiskers and feet placement Only chatgpt high and marginally grok expert had acceptable answers.