3 ms·

Ffs, just the dumbest comments in this thread. Jumping from “caused by man” to arson is weapons grade stupidity.

• pvaldes 3mo ago
  Countries use a scale of wildfire risk If there is a clear prohibition to use fire in some location today, because strong winds and low humidity create high risk of wildfires; and somebody still ignores the prohibition and start fire in five different locations in the worse conditions of the year, knowing well that every firefighter is busy yet on one of the other 800 wildfires active, would you still classify that as "accidental"? Sometimes things are exactly what they seem to be. One barbecue that goes rogue with green level is an accident. With red level conditions, is a crime.
  • rjrjrjrj 3mo ago
    There are many parts of Canada under no fire restrictions at the moment. Accidental or even negligent does not automatically mean arson. Jumping to that conclusion is silly.
    • pvaldes 3mo ago
      Are this areas burning? Accidents are rare, and the fires in clusters and other common patterns are typical One alleged arsonist detained in Galicia (Spain), with a bag full of stuff. After several wildfires stated to appear near his village in the last two weeks he was watched a morning moving into two locations that soon started to burn. Near houses of course. Why not?
      • rjrjrjrj 3mo ago
        https://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/en/interactive-map?selectedDate=2026-07-17&layerIds=public%3Acwfif_national_activefires%2Cpublic%3Afwi https://cwfis.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/en/interactive-map?selectedDat...