4 ms·
It's an unenforceable clause. The affected party has no means to prove that a breach has happened.
by fluoridation 3mo ago
It's an unenforceable clause. The affected party has no means to prove that a breach has happened.
- fzysingularity 3mo agoI think we all ought to look at the ZDR fine-print here. I get that in principle that there's no retention, but these are powerful models that can comprehend, paraphrase and summarize your logs for the sake of "product" improvement. Who knows what's collected here.
- oceanplexian 3mo ago> It's an unenforceable clause. The affected party has no means to prove that a breach has happened. Big tech spends hundreds of millions in high powered lawyers, audit logs, and contractual agreements with the sole purpose of proving your point wrong.
- fluoridation 3mo agoCool. And have they?