3 ms·
I just tried Panopticlick both before and after enabling private browsing in Safari (Mac OS X) and the site identified the same number of identifiable pieces of
by chiph 14y ago
I just tried Panopticlick both before and after enabling private browsing in Safari (Mac OS X) and the site identified the same number of identifiable pieces of information about me. So it looks like that has no effect.
Which sort of makes sense - the info it's looking at is basically the header info. Screen size, installed fonts, IP address, and so on. It's not relying on cookies, as cookies can't be seen/read across domains (you can't tell I'm an Amazon customer if I just visit you out of the blue).
- justincormack 14y agoYou used to be able to by reading back CSS styles of visited links. May be fixed now. http://blog.adrianroselli.com/2010/03/mozilla-to-modify-how-css-visited-works.html?m=1 http://blog.adrianroselli.com/2010/03/mozilla-to-modify-how-...
- cynwoody 14y agoIt is fixed. CSS may color visited links red, but they hacked getComputedStyle to return the normal color instead. So, you can't tell if that link to Amazon you just created is visited or not. And you can no longer set, for example, font-weight:bold for visited links, because that would change the size of the element, and they decided, unlike in the color case, that it would be too complicated to get all the APIs to lie about the new geometry.
- justincormack 14y agoIs it fixed in all browsers?