4 ms·
In the same way that 99.99% of standard mastodon users are on mastodon.social, yes. No, the million of users sharing porn on entirely isolated mastodon instanc
by well_ackshually 3mo ago
In the same way that 99.99% of standard mastodon users are on mastodon.social, yes.
No, the million of users sharing porn on entirely isolated mastodon instances that absolutely nobody wants to federate with because you'd be exposed to pictures of minors within 5 minutes do not count.
- archagon 3mo agoA bizarre exaggeration. In my feeds, maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of the people I follow use non-.social instances. The same cannot be said of Bluesky.
- pfych 3mo agomaybe 1/2 of the people in my bsky feeds use non bsky pds'es & clients?
- polymer8563 3mo agocheck your sources
- Vinnl 3mo agoMastodon.social is too big, but it is on a different scale: https://arewedecentralizedyet.online https://arewedecentralizedyet.online (Though I do agree it's partially irrelevant, depending on what problem you're trying to solve.)
- ktosobcy 3mo agoyeah… but nope. yes, mastodon.social is big but there is more plurality. There is about 250k users on mastodon.social while whole fediverse is about 10 milion On the other hand while tere is roughly 35 milion bluesky users there is only ~50k on non-blusky PDSes (https://blue.mackuba.eu/directory/pdses https://blue.mackuba.eu/directory/pdses) so there's that…