2 ms·
I never encounter things which need CMake <3.5 features. I constantly encounter things which declare their "minimum supported version" to be below 3.5. Which m
by mort96 3mo ago
I never encounter things which need CMake <3.5 features. I constantly encounter things which declare their "minimum supported version" to be below 3.5.
Which makes a lot of sense for those projects! They can be built with CMake 3.2 because they don't need anything introduced in a newer version, so why not declare 3.2 to be the earliest supported version? It's not their fault that CMake interprets "minimum supported version" weirdly?