3 ms·
I agree. Often the benefits of these kind of things outweigh the risks of abuse. Law-abiding citizens rarely have what to fear from normal "surveillance".
by arikrak 14y ago
I agree. Often the benefits of these kind of things outweigh the risks of abuse. Law-abiding citizens rarely have what to fear from normal "surveillance".
- CamperBob2 14y agoI agree. Often the benefits of these kind of things outweigh the risks of abuse. Law-abiding citizens rarely have what to fear from normal "surveillance". Do you live in the US? If so, you're not almost certainly not a "law-abiding citizen." The only question is, which laws count?
- AutoCorrect 14y agoand which laws will be enforced, or ignored by the reigning excecutive
- sami36 14y agoThat is not what I said. I think these developments are toxic in the long term however well-intentioned they are when they're first introduced. I was pointing out their implications are even worse for countries without a tradition of freedom because they'll allow for an even tighter control of information & around the clock surveillance thus enabling the security apparatuses of those regimes to nip in the bud any revolutionary movement.