4 ms·
> Its not as good as GLM 5.2 for agentic workflows while also being bigger GLM 5.2 underwent extensive post-training and iteration since its original release t
by InsideOutSanta 3mo ago
> Its not as good as GLM 5.2 for agentic workflows while also being bigger
GLM 5.2 underwent extensive post-training and iteration since its original release to reach its current state. This seems like an extremely strong model for a first release, with a lot of potential for improvement, just like DS4.
Sometimes I wish Meta had stuck with Llama 4 a bit longer to see how much further it could be pushed.
- verdverm 3mo agoThis is a great point
- hirako2000 3mo agoLlama 4 wasn't deemed a success, and Meta pivoted away as its now former head of AI couldn't demonstrate, nor even showed interest in, business profit. They overspent on llama 3 anyway so money ran dry, LeCun is good at running research, but budgets didn't stretch. Meta isn't investing in frontier big models anymore.
- nl 3mo ago> Meta isn't investing in frontier big models anymore Yes they are. Meta Muse is their attempt. It's below frontier performance at the moment but they are spending on getting there.
- nl 3mo agoLlama 4 was a bad architecture. Meta Spark is moderately promising but of course closed source.