4 ms·
They didn't have "open" or "free" as prefix.
by zkmon 3mo ago
They didn't have "open" or "free" as prefix.
- lukan 3mo agoBut apple still goes after real apple producers, who are older than apple. https://www.popsci.com/technology/apple-swiss-trademark/ https://www.popsci.com/technology/apple-swiss-trademark/ Something is wrong, when this is happening.
- yorwba 3mo agoYou link is incorrectly paraphrasing this Wired article https://www.wired.com/story/apple-vs-apples-trademark-battle/ https://www.wired.com/story/apple-vs-apples-trademark-battle... by claiming that Apple sued Swiss farmers, even though Apple sued the Institute of Intellectual Property instead. Apple won the case a month after publication of that article https://bvger.weblaw.ch/pdf/B-4493-2022_2023-07-26_c897bf22-1587-4f0f-9233-4255eaefad7d.pdf https://bvger.weblaw.ch/pdf/B-4493-2022_2023-07-26_c897bf22-... and the Swiss Fruit Union continues to use their apple logo (which looks completely different from any of the apple images Apple has trademarked) https://www.swissfruit.ch https://www.swissfruit.ch
- saghm 3mo agoThe nouns also aren't just generic terms for the type of products they're making. OpenApple wouldn't sound confusing in the same way for a laptop and phone manufacturer as it would for a company producing apples in a non-open way.