3 ms·
I agree permanent standard time is a better solution. But maybe we change work to 8-4 from 9-5 and might be better that way anyway.
by hammock 3mo ago
I agree permanent standard time is a better solution. But maybe we change work to 8-4 from 9-5 and might be better that way anyway.
- alistairSH 3mo agoDoes anybody actually work 9-5 (ie 7 hours assuming they take a break or two)?
- BeetleB 3mo agoMost of us. (It's actually 8-5 with an hour's break).
- alistairSH 3mo agoWhich was my point - 9-5 isn't really a thing, it's usually 8-5 or 9-6 or worse. If we're going to adjust time zone, we should at least agree on when most people are/are-not at the office/school/farm fields/etc.
- ajsnigrutin 3mo ago> But maybe we change work to 8-4 from 9-5 and might be better that way anyway. Why not change the working hours of stores, and tv programming and other schedules too? In the end, you get the same thing as a clock change, but having to change the times of everything everywhere.
- antisthenes 3mo agoFuck all the night owls, right?