3 ms·
I had to flag this article for violating HN's policy against submitting things written by AI. Which is a shame, because the premise is intriguing. But it's pr
by jasonkester 4mo ago
I had to flag this article for violating HN's policy against submitting things written by AI.
Which is a shame, because the premise is intriguing. But it's pretty rude to expect every one of us to sift through ten pages of AI tells to reverse engineer the prompts that hold the information the author wanted to convey. As the saying goes, "if you couldn't be bothered to write it, why should I bother to read it?"
So I ask the Author: Please write this article for us using your own words, taking your own time to convey your thoughts. Submit it and let us read it.
I bet it will be better than this.
- tonyedgecombe 4mo agoI’m not sure which is worse, content written by AI or people complaining about content being written by AI.
- yummybrainz 4mo agoPretty sure it's the former!
- willismichael 4mo agoNo way, it's AI generated content complaining about AI generated content.
- scratcheee 4mo agoWhen it comes to fluff/slop/etc, worse can be measured by word count, so there’s your answer.
- miniBill 4mo agoThe former
- mikkolaakkonen 4mo agoI totally agree, would love to read this "properly" !
- a-french-anon 4mo agoEven more outrageous: there are two authors listed.