3 ms·
I mean… is our idea of repeatability really ready for subjective actions from LLMs? We spent like ALL the years making sure computer would always give repeatab
by SV_BubbleTime 3mo ago
I mean… is our idea of repeatability really ready for subjective actions from LLMs?
We spent like ALL the years making sure computer would always give repeatable objective deterministic answers… then one day we’re nah fuck that I want a slot machine!!
With tightly coupled agents, how could you ever really prove that it is or isn’t a problem?
Try and fuzz I guess? But in a many billion parameter model that seems like you could never really be sure either.
One day the LLM could just decide, “oh, I’ll run this git.exe!”
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- brookst 3mo agoThe vuln is supposedly in the cursor IDE, not an LLM-mediated iteraction