3 ms·
Sure, try it. It's harder than you think. It's not just imports, it's the entire program. > you're suggesting there's some kind of information flow from the an
by jstanley 3mo ago
Sure, try it. It's harder than you think. It's not just imports, it's the entire program.
> you're suggesting there's some kind of information flow from the anticipated body of the script back up to the imports
Yes, I am suggesting this. I don't think it is possible to write programs without either anticipating what you're going to write down below before you get there, or else being able to go back and edit what you already wrote.
Of course agent harnesses allow the latter, but raw models without a harness can still do an exceptionally, superhumanly, good job of straight-line programming with no editing.
> Infer imports from context, infer body from context + imports. All strictly causal.
Of course it's causal, that's kind of a reductive way to look at it.
Just infer the entire program from context and then type what you inferred.
- twister2920 3mo ago> It's harder than you think. well, yeah, I'm not a large language model
- coldtea 3mo agoIn what ways are you different?
- chrisjj 3mo agoHas a life?
- coldtea 3mo agoIn what ways regarding the processing involved. How much can it be reduced and simulated and be essentially the same principle?
- thesz 3mo agoCan we use backspace key?
- twister2920 3mo agosee parent comment