3 ms·
wait until you hear why, and that you can optionally use e2e but lose other functionality.
by pylotlight 3mo ago
wait until you hear why, and that you can optionally use e2e but lose other functionality.
- SXX 3mo agoAnd end-to-end encryption not supported on web client and doesn't sync properly between devices. Useless.
- lesostep 3mo ago>> doesn't sync properly between devices which is good, actually. We don't want a way through which a server could tell a new device all the information it needs to decrypt messags
- asqueella 3mo agoI thought this was a long solved problem: the server syncs encrypted data, and the user provides the decryption key from another device (via QR codes, BLE, …)
- WmWsjA6B29B4nfk 3mo agoMake it device-to-device then
- grayhatter 3mo agoyeah, it is good! I hate usability features too!
- inigyou 3mo agoYou either have E2EE or you don't. If you have usability, you don't have E2EE.
- grayhatter 3mo agoI can't have E2EE and also have cross device data sync? counter point https://github.com/GrayHatter/toxcore/tree/multi-device https://github.com/GrayHatter/toxcore/tree/multi-device (I guess technically you'd need https://github.com/uTox/uTox/tree/mdev https://github.com/uTox/uTox/tree/mdev too)