4 ms·
Absolutely. While we're at it, why should asbestos be regulated? You can just not go in buildings that have it.
by semilin 4mo ago
Absolutely. While we're at it, why should asbestos be regulated? You can just not go in buildings that have it.
- brandonmenc 4mo agoCall me when "infinite scroll" causes cancer.
- bradleykingz 4mo agoit kinda does?
- denkmoon 4mo agoIt is a cancer of the body politic.
- afavour 4mo agoI would agree that infinite scrolling social media feeds do induce a kind of sickness. But a mental one.
- z0ltan 4mo ago[dead]
- pjc50 4mo agoThis is basically the Californian Prop 65 compromise: put up a sign saying the building contains carcinogens, but not actually do anything about them.
- bcjdjsndon 4mo agoSo log off? If you think it's really that bad why are you anywhere near a screen at all?
- pjc50 4mo agoDo you know what a negative externality is?
- telchior 4mo agoThere's good reason for a lot of the inaction around asbestos. If it's not moving, not being touched and not accessible to kids / pets etc then it's fine to leave alone. The alternative being extremely costly remediation, and there are still millions of structures with asbestos in them. ... Prop 65 is dumb though. Kind of a trend in California law.
- tt24 4mo agoI’d have no problem with this as long as the building makes it known that it contains asbestos. Infinite scroll is immediately evident. Just don’t use it if you don’t like it
- gghackernewsgg 4mo agoCompletely agree. What are your thoughts on introducing a law that requires social media sites with infinite scroll to feature an addiction warning, something like: "Using this platform may cause addiction in some users."?
- tt24 4mo agoNot thrilled about it but it would be way better than this