3 ms·

If it was due to some other legal dispute, or an accident, or a personal vendetta, or… idk, i will wait and see

• inigyou 4mo ago
  so censorship, accident, or censorship. I guess it could be accidental censorship.
  • kennywinker 4mo ago
    Some other legal dispute - trademark law, for example, isn’t censorship. Personal vendetta (i hate frank so i sabotaged his work), is also not censorship. Could also be the result of a hack for ransom, which is also not censorship Anyway, this is dumb. It probably is censorship, but i’m still gonna need a confirmation before i get mad about it.
    • inigyou 4mo ago
      Trademark law is a censorship law. Censorship based on personal vendetta is censorship.
      • kennywinker 3mo ago
        I don’t mean to censor you here, but I disagree. If everything is censorship, then censorship becomes meaningless. Anyway, i gotta go censor something for breakfast, have a censor censor. Censor!
        • inigyou 3mo ago
          Censorship is when speech or publication is prevented. Hope this explanation helps.
          • kennywinker 3mo ago
            Yes well my mouth was full of breakfast so the toast was censoring me. Incidentally, taking down a domain used for short links doesn’t prevent speech or publication, since they have about 20 other domains that the same info is available at. Like how knocking over a newspaper box doesn’t censor the paper. So, by your own definition this isn’t censorship. Which is weird because it probably is censorship. Almost like your definition is bad.